¥ | wonder if the people who just crossed the street are going to 7-Eleven? That guy didn’t signal at the light... and that guy did the ‘Vancouver Manoeuver’ (what my friends and | call people who turn left from the far right-hand lane grrrr)..._ | wonder if this is a live feed? Was somebody watching me from this seat when | came in?... | wonder if I'll rec- ognize somebody? | feel sneaky, | am a voyeur. | can feel my eyes glistening slightly with excitement. “Hello, | see you.” | spy with my hidden eye.... “Hey,... something’s happening...” the images are fading... “Is the ride over?” Suddenly I’m looking at two images of myself sitting on the middle stool in the gallery. “Il knew some- body was taking my picture! When did | let my guard down?” (Paranoia sets in.) Again | examine the room for the black eye... nothing. | wish the video would go back to the street corner... ...I face myself. On the left image, | am still. On the right, | see small white streaks of light that reveal my chest inhaling and exhaling. The sound of the breathing and heartbeat register in my mind again. Are they live feeds too? Am | hearing my own heartbeat? | hold my breath to slow the beat down. | am self-conscious... | hope nobody comes into the gallery right now... | wait... nothing hap- pens. | move my arm and my mirrorred image on the right moves her arm. | try it again, but this time | move my leg. The woman on the screen moves her leg... (It’s actually kind of interesting.) | move more parts... (really interesting...) like | am a voyeur watching myself. | am a scientist experimenting on me, the lab rat. It is so bizarre to experience the subjective and objective simultaneously. | feel vio- | stand up from the chair and begin moving in big- ger gestures, delighting again in the challenge posed to reverse, flip and superimpose the images.... | am a ghost, | have a tangible shadow. “Hey!” (the images are fading again.) “Oh for Pete's sakel...” (back to the street corner...) Figures, | was just getting into it. As one becomes accustomed to and then adept at synthesizing the images, aspects of surveillance surface again. However, the paranoid anxiety felt earlier is now replaced with a scopophilic pleasure (- to look at people with a controlling and curious gaze.) The sense of power for viewers shifts with a change in their position from in front of the lens to behind it. But the power inherent in the gaze (aug- mented by the observer's unseen position in the gallery) is offset by the conceptual synthesis required by viewers at each frame, distancing them from fully engaging in their own visual pleasure. With impeccable timing, just as viewers become comfortable oscillating back and forth like a rotat- ing magnet, pulled in by their desire and pushed out by the mental task, Rokeby shifts the piece. By using an algorithmic formula that combines time and the motion inside the gallery as variables, the connection to the surveillance camera outside switches to one located inside the installation space. Acting as a foreshadowing device, the cam- era shutter is heard again, and viewers are sudden- ly confronted by their own image on the split- screen. Parameters set up earlier do not change: On the left, one sees those objects in the room which are still; on the right, those objects which are moving (namely the viewer.) Paranoia returns, but is quickly replaced by a more specific type of scopophilia - narcissism, as observers turn their controlling and curious gaze on themselves. “Here, curiosity and the wish to look intermingle with a fascination for likeness and recognition: the human face, the human body, the relationship between the human form and its surroundings, the visible presence of the person in the world.” (-Laura Mulvey) Identification with the screen image is enhanced in Rokeby’s piece compared with the identification spectators undergo with characters in a film. If narcissism occurs when there is an identification with the image, then iden- tification here is much greater since the images pro- jected are those of the viewers themselves. continued on pg. 20 a3 @ I wonder if the people who just crossed the street are going to 7-Eleven? That guy didn't signal at the light...and that guy did the ‘Vancouver Manoeuver’ (what my friends and | call people who turn left from the far right-hand lane grrr)... | wonder if this is a live feed? Was somebody watching me from this seat when I came in?... wonder if 'll rec- ‘ognize somebody? | feel sneaky, | am a voyeur. | can feel my eyes glistening slightly with excitement. “Hello, | see you.” | spy with my hidden eye.. “Hey... something’s happening..” the images are fading... “Is the ride over?” As one becomes accustomed to and then adept at synthesizing th images, aspects of surveillance However, the paranoid anxiety felt earlier is now replaced with a scopophilic pleasure surface again. ¢ to look at people with a controlling and curious ) The sense of power for viewers shifts with a change in their position from in front of the lens to behind it. But the power inherent in the gaze (au mented by the observer's unseen position in the gallery) is offset by the conceptual synthesis required by viewers at each fi from fully en; distancing them Suddenly I'm looking at two images of myself sitting ‘on the middle stool in the gallery. “I knew some- body was taking my picture! When did | let my guard down?” (Paranoia sets in.) Again | examine the room for the black eye... nothing. | wish the Video would go back to the street corner... face myself. On the left image,! am still. On the right, I see small white streaks of light that reveal my chest inhaling and exhaling, The sound of the breathing and heartbeat register in my mind again. ‘Are they live feeds too? Am | hearing my own heartbeat? | hold my breath to slow the beat down. | am self-conscious... hope nobody comes into the gallery right now... | wait... nothing hap- pens. | move my arm and my mirrorred image on the right moves her arm. | try it again, but this time I'move my leg. The woman on the screen moves her leg... (I's actually kind of interesting) | move more parts... (realy interesting.) like | am a voyeur watching myself. | am a scientist experimenting on me, the lab rat. It is so bizarre to experience the subjective and objective simultaneously. I feel vio- lated and omnipotent... s this sado-masochistic?. I stand up from the chair and begin moving in big- ‘ger gestures, delighting again in the challenge posed to reverse, flip and superimpose the images.... am a ghost, | have a tangible shadow. “Hey!” (the images are fading again.) “Oh for Pete's sakel.. (back to the street corner...) Figures, | was just getting into it. With impe comfortable oscillating back and forth like a rotat- ing magnet, pulled in by their desire and pushed out able timing, just as viewers become by the mental task, Rokeby shifts the piece. By using an algorithmic formula that combines time and the motion inside the gallery as variables, the connection to the surveillance camera outside switches to one located inside the installation space, Acting as a foreshadowing device, the cam- era shutter is heard again, and viewers are sudden- confronted by their own image on the split- reen. Parameters t up earlier do not change: On the left, one sees those objects in the room which are still; on the moving (namely the vi is quickly replaced by scopophilia - ht, those objects which are er.) Paranoia returns, but a more specific type of arcissism, as observers turn their controlling and curious gaze on themselves. Jere, curiosity and the wish to look intermingle with a fascination for likeness and rec the human body. between the human form and its surroundin visible presence of the person in the world. (-Laura Mulvey) Identification with the screen image is enhanced in Rokeby's piece com with the identification spectators under characters in a film. If narcissism occurs when there is an identification with the image, then iden- tification here is much greater since the images pro- human face, the relationship those of the viewers themselves. continued on pg. 20