photo supplied by Vancouver Opera The Elixir of Love is a comic opera, or opera buffa as it would be in Italian. Light entertainment really. It's sort of the 1832 equivalent of Austin Powers or Pret- ty Woman. It's not really meant to shed any light on serious existential questions, but rather to entertain and _ amuse. The Elixir of Love succeeds admirably. Sure, you can pack in a lot more easily accessi- ble complexity into movies. In general we're accustomed to much more rapid communication these days than the good people of 1832. To a 1999 sensibility the plot seemed a bit slow at times. | mean it's laughable, really. The story is quite simple. Nemorino Vohn Osborn) loves Adina Vane Gier- ing-De Haan). Adina loves Nemorino too, of course, she just doesn't know yet. Instead she makes to marry Sgt. Belcore Ueff Mattsey). Naturally, this doesn't happen. The catalyst and resolution of the conflict is the quack elixir of love sold by Dr. Dulcamara (Frangois Loup). Then again, you don't go to the opera for the plot. It's the pageantry of it all. My companion and | got plenty of enjoyment out of regarding and discussing our surroundings. The sets, courtesy of the New Orleans Opera, were gorgeous. The mechanically forced perspective combined with the rich golden lighting (Alan Brodie) cre- © ats ated an overall effect of a Golden Age oil depicting an Italian scene. Quite appropriate when you think about it. Then there's the people watching. We specu- lated what fun it would be to be one of the child extras (supernumeraries they're called). Watching our fellow audience is rewarding as well. Some people dress remarkably well, and there was an large number of sweet looking old men in black suits and bow-ties. Others, it appears, look even less stylish when they try to dress up. Yet others again don't dress up at all. Nonetheless it was fun to pretend one was rich and sophisticated for a night. This is not the Metropolitan or La Scala or anything, but neither is it the Emily Carr Auditorium. As for the performance itself... well let me start off by stating that while | am no expert in opera. | do lis- ten to music regularly. My companion and | both agreed that individual cast members were slighly shaky and weak (for opera singers that is) at the outset. However, we disagreed as to whom that was, and both of us were really impressed with the singers whom the other thought weak. By the middle of the first act however, we agreed (when we talked about it later, we didn't chat in the middle of the show - that would be rude) that everyone was sufficiently warmed up and did justice to their parts. My personal favourite was Jeff Mattsey's Sgt. Belcore. He seemed such a perfectly nice poncy bas- tard. The orchestra, conducted by Tyrone Paterson, did nice job, at least to my ears. One of the advantages to attending the opera in the present rather than in, say, 1904, is that the trans- lated lyrics are projected onto a screen above the stage. This allows those of us who don't understand sung Ital- ian a la 1832 to gain a greater understanding of the unfolding plot and jokes. In fact, general laughter issued from the audience at numerous times, partially because of the screen but also, | suspect, due to the solid stage directions (David Gately). If you're thinking that going to the opera is worth experiencing, | have no trouble recommending the Elixir of Love. The story of The Cherry Orchard, written by Anton Chekhov in 1904, still seems relevant today in a pre-millennium tension kind of way. Director Christopher Weddell asks the viewer, "How do we humans adjust to the temporal flow of life? How do we deal with the suffer- ing of change?" Indeed... For the characters of The Cherry Orchard, change simply means loss. The story takes place on the estate of once-wealthy Lyubov Ranevskaya. She is facing bankrupt- cy and her beloved cherry orchard is about to be lost. The only one who can save it is Lopakhin, a peasant who has risen in rank to become a wealthy businessman. Unfortu- nately for Lyubov and her family, Lopakhin's plans include chopping down the cherry orchard and building summer chalets for the inhabitants of a nearby industrial town. Lyubov and her family are so caught up in their romantic reminiscences of the orchard that, whilé lingering in a shadowland of an idealized past, they lose the estate like it's on a runaway train. High idealism, class structure, loss, and unrequit- ed love pepper the characters’ psychic landscapes and get in the way of practical problem-solving. As a community theatre production, United Play- ers' effort is a good one. There were a few rough spots on opening night, particularly the grand hiss during a defining moment in the play. : The most fleshed-out of the characters was Lopakhin, who, like the modern ladder-climber, may never be allowed to forget his past. Yet, ironically, Lopakhin seems to be the only character who has the ability to live in the present. Eas Bee Trevor Devall's Lopakihn is at once quiet and dis- armed and then large and ignominious. Devall's delivery is good and | believe his indignation. That.1 huff along with him speaks to Devall's ability to: create empathy for his character. : Darlene Arsenault does what she can with the confounding Charlotta Ivanova. Charlotta is the jester of . the production, yet her words are so out of context one questions their very: necessity in the piece. Taken out of context, Charlotta seems like’a narcissist with very bad timing, yet all the characters defer to her when she speaks. Arsenault is intense and she projects beyond the confines of the small Jericho Arts Center stage. ECIAD's very own Alex Williams indulged his other passions when he took on the role of Yasha the young footman. A dashing, suave lady's man, Yasha is sar- castic to the hilt. He breaks hearts one minute and fetches drinks the next, all with an air of mastery and arrogance. Williams' dark good looks suit the role perfectly and, though the role is small, Yasha is always around, and Williams plays the character's cards appropriately close to his chest. Other notable moments came from Karen Rose who plays the lovelorn chambermaid, Dunyasha, and Jason Diablo as the earnest student, Petrya Trofimov. United Players does a lot with a little and it is great to see young actors cutting their teeth here. I'm looking forward to the upcoming School for Wives by Moliére and Peter Whelan's The Herbal Bed . 4 2 5 4q 2 a The Elixir of Love is a comic opera, or opera buffa as it would be in Italian. Light entertainment really. It's sort of the 1832 equivalent of Austin Powers or Pret- ty Woman. It's not really meant to shed any light on serious existential questions, but rather to entertain and amuse. The Elixir of Love succeeds admirably. Sure, you can pack in a lot more easily accessi ble complexity into movies. In general we're accustomed ‘to much more rapid communication these days than the good people of 1832. To a 1999 sensibility the plot seemed a bit slow at times. I mean it's laughable, really. The story is quite simple. Nemorino Gohn Osborn) loves Adina (ane Gier- ing-De Haan). Adina loves Nemorino too, of course, she just doesn't know yet. Instead she makes to marry Sgt Belcore (eff Mattsey). Naturally, this doesn't happen. The catalyst and resolution of the conflict is the quack elixir of love sold by Dr. Duleamara (Francois Loup). Then again, you don't go to the opera for the plot. t's the pageantry of it all. My companion and | got plenty of enjoyment out of regarding and discussing our surroundings. The sets, courtesy of the New Orleans Opera, were gorgeous. The mechanically forced perspective combined with the rich golden lighting (Alan Brodie) cre~ @*® ated an overall effect of a Golden Age oil depicting an Italian scene. Quite appropriate when you think about it, Then there's the people watching. We specu- lated what fun it would be to be one of the child extras (supernumeraries they're called). Watching our fellow audience is rewarding as well. Some people dress remarkably well, and there was an large number of sweet ooking old men in black suits and bow-ties. Others, it appears, look even less stylish when they try to dress up. Yet others again don't dress up at all. Nonetheless it was fun to pretend one was rich and sophisticated for a night. This is not the Metropolitan or La Scala or anything, but neither is it the Emily Carr Auditorium. As for the performance itself... well let me start off by stating that while | am no expert in opera I do lis- ten to music regularly. My companion and | both agreed that individual cast members were slighly shaky and weak (for opera singers that is) at the outset. However, we disagreed as to whom that was, and both of us were really impressed with the singers whom the other thought weak. By the middle of the first act however, ‘we agreed (when we talked about it later, we didn't chat in the middle of the show - that would be rude) that everyone was sufficiently warmed up and did justice to their parts. My personal favourite was Jeff Mattsey's Sgt. Belcore. He seemed such a perfectly nice poncy bas- tard. The orchestra, conducted by Tyrone Paterson, did nice job, at least to my ears. ‘One of the advantages to attending the opera in the present rather than in, say, 1904, is that the trans- lated lyrics are projected onto a screen above the stage. This allows those of us who don't understand sung Ital- ian a la 1832 to gain a greater understanding of the unfolding plot and jokes. In fact, general laughter issued from the audience at numerous times, partially because of the screen but also, | suspect, due to the solid stage directions (David Gately). If you're thinking that going to the opera is worth experiencing, | have no trouble recommending the Elixir of Love. The story of The Cherry Orchard, written by Anton Chekhov in 1904, still seems relevant today in a pre-millennium tension kind of way. Director Christopher Weddell asks the viewer, "How do we humans adjust to the temporal flow of life? How do we deal with the suffer- ing of change?" Indeed. For the characters of The Cherry Orchard, change simply means loss. The story takes place on the estate of once-wealthy Lyubov Ranevskaya. She is facing bankrupt- cy and her beloved cherry orchard is about to be lost. The only one who can save it is Lopakhin, a peasant who has risen in rank to become a wealthy businessman. Unfortu- nately for Lyubov and her family, Lopakhin's plans include chopping down the cherry orchard and building summer chalets for the inhabitants of a nearby industrial town. Lyubov and her family are so caught up in their romantic reminiscences of the orchard that, while lingering in a shadowland of an idealized past, they lose the estate like it's on a runaway train High idealism, class structure, loss, and unrequit- ed love pepper the characters’ psychic landscapes and get in the way of practical problem-solving, ‘As a community theatre production, United Play- ers’ effort is a good one. There were a few rough spots on opening night, particularly the grand hiss during a defining moment in the play. The most fleshed-out of the characters was Lopakhin, who, lke the modern ladder-climber, may never be allowed to forget his past. Yet, ironically, Lopakhin seems to be the only character. who has the ability to live in the present Trevor Devall's Lopakihn is at once quiet and dis- armed and then large and ignominious. Devall's delivery is ‘good and | believe his indignation. That | huff along with him speaks to Devall's ability to create empathy for his character. Darlene Arsenault does what she can with the confounding Charlotta Ivanova. Charlotta is the jester of. the production, yet her words are so out of context one questions their very necessity in the piece. Taken out of context, Charlotta seems lke a narcissist with very bad timing, yet all the characters defer to her whert she speaks. Arsenault is intense and she projects beyond the confines of the small Jericho Arts Center stage. ECIAD's very own Alex Wiliams indulged his other passions when he took on the role of Yasha the young foot man. A dashing, suave lady's man, Yasha is sar- castic to the hilt. He breaks hearts one minute and fetches drinks the next, all with an air of mastery and arrogance. Williams’ dark good looks suit the role perfectly and, though the role is small, Yasha is always around, and Wiliams plays the character's cards appropriately close to his chest (Other notable moments came from Karen Rose who plays the lovelom chambermaid, Dunyasha, and Jason Diablo as the earnest student, Petrya Trofimov. United Players does a lot with a little and it is great to see young actors cutting their teeth here. I'm looking forward to the upcoming Schoo! for Wives by ‘Moliére and Peter Whelan's The Herbal Bed