(WWW) Hegemonics The Depreciation of the Fake, Part ll Munching On Planet of the Arts by James Baker his article came into being when it was relayed to me, through that most semiotic of Eco-esque communication channels, The Hoffman, that Jonathan and Harald, two of the editors of Planet of the Arts, wanted someone (me) to write about the PoA and Planet Hollywood as cultural entities. Well, if they were going to spring for dinner, why not? Irony is always easier to appre- . ciate when some one else is footing the bill (and someone is always paying for it). But what, b’sides the word “planet” in the title, do these two “enti- ties” have in common, or even in contrast? The more | think about Planet Hollywood, the less | like it, and | didn’t like it that much to begin with. Except for the knowledge that someone, somewhere, is getting filthy rich of fthis project, which never fails to warm the mercenary cockles of my heart and, | suppose tangentially, that the bigger the chain gets, the more work Stallone and Willis will have for themselves, and less time to make the movies that made the show possible. That’s not a bad thing either. Planet Hollywood sez it’s a restaurant purporting to celebrate the place of movies in our lives. But it is really about the replacement of movies for our lives. Why actually talk to someone when there's a video monitor to watch, and an ambient sound volume that keeps all but the most excited of exclamations from being heard. And | resent being made to feel like a loud obnoxious American, which, if you'll permit this small bit of Canuck cultural superiority, is what Planet Hollywood makes me feel like, from the limited selection of food | am offered to the way | have to shout at the person across the table from me to the inescapable impression that | am a bad person for not revelling in the movies as | should. And this perhaps is the key to looking at both Planets: what they're both about, basically, when it all comes down to it, in essence, more or less, is the mediation of our relationships to each other. The PoA, written in an art school, mostly by art schoolers, mostly about art and art school, is a mediator Bue between ourselves and a collective experience of art school, of our own context, and, indirectly, a media- tor between ourselves and the art/design that is made/performed/perceived here. Which is in itself a mediator between ourselves and our contexts and others and their contexts, hopefully a meaningful and kind mediator. Planet Hollywood isn't. I'd like to think the PoA is, and | honestly don’t mean this ironically, a “kinder, gentler” channel than Planet Hollywood. Yes, | know, | find it hard to see those words together without thinking of the bully who gave them to us, and | wonder what he thinks of Planet Hollywood. Here at Emily Carr Institute, despite being such a small school, just over half the size of my high school, there're a lot of strange foax doing really weird things a lot of the time, and, sooner or later, someone is bound, inadvertently | hope, to step on someone else's toes, or knock them down and skin a knee. And someone's got to put the band-aid on. The PoA may be one means of doing that, although | hope it’s also a little more than that. March 1997 / Planet of the Arts 33 After all, I'm paying for it, just as you are. And I’m not just talking about money. Planet Hollywood celebrates homogeneity and noise. The PoA? That's hard for me to say, as | can’t escape the lurking feeling that this very article is far more noise than signal, embedded as it is within the PoA itself, and hence a part of the very channel it's trying to understand, | think it's having a difficult time of things. Perhaps the best description | have for the PoA is an anecdote. Two issues ago it ran an article that |, to put it mildly, thought was erroneous. And | was concerned about the either careless or deliberate spread of misinformation at a time when | think the school both for its internal health and its health as an institution in a volatile economic context could least afford that kind of misinformation. So | could have stewed on that for a while, or respond. Which is what | did, though the response was, in the words of all those kind enough to read it, “too damn long.” Oh well. | wasn’t aiming at the thirty-second- commercial-sound-bite audience of Planet Hollywood. And despite the ridiculous length, the foax at the PoA were generous enough to give it space, unedited, though a little judicious pruning may not have been a bad thing. And | thought to myself, “well, the system works,” and felt better about the whole thing. The system works, and I’ve had my say, and there is now at least a dialogue, a discussion, a series of voices moving back and forth and stepping on one another's toes and saying “sorry” and trying not to do it again. And | wonder if Planet Hollywood would be so accommodating. [One last note: if this article seems a little lop- sided in giving space to Planet Hollywood, well, that’s because | found it hard to discuss something | haven't even seen yet, the issue of PoA that this'll appear in. How to describe something still evolving, changing, hopefully improving? Planet Hollywood, now, that’s easy.] @s Tom Becher, Dean of Design Glen Clark, Honorary Patron of the Institute Admissions (604) 844-3850 Re-initializing art, Re-booting design, Re-creating B.C. Endowments 844-3871 PHOTO BY ALEXANDRA CRAM * ign Division (Industrial Design) Scott Gallery 844-3811 Solly’s Parting Saleem Khatak Planet of the Arts Magazine 844-3861 Bagel run Pushing gale of wind Swift wheeled journey to Bagel Review Haiku by Alan Hoffman with James Baker James with bagel Motorbike tempest Plain Cloud of steam for tea Chewy smooth skin yields to bite But inside tender Chocolate chip James has his with jam a harvest of summer past But Jenn thinks them strange Sesame seed Cello plays to join Sunlight entering window Classic elegance I forfeit comfort As obligation calls me Swift to Emily iW) Hegemonics March 1997 / Planet of the Arts 33 The Depreciation of the Fake, Part Munching On Planet of the Arts PHOTO BY ALEXANDRA CRAM Re-initializing art, Re-booting design, Re-creating B.C.