It’s time to break free of the stati rigid tyranny of the pose and create — a more interactive, dynamic pre } co-creation. In other words, it’s | riding on the back of muse and Intimacy | am blessed with numerous friends, colleagues, and family who are excited to model for me. This creative relationship is based on mutuality and appreciation — there is a cyclical movement of inspiration between the two of us. When my eyes are on my paper, my model's eyes are on me and he or she is resting, taking a break from the pose. Each time my eyes return to look at this wonderful human being in front of me, my muse is back in the pose. It works in much the same way as when | am drawing myself, in that he or she is in a constant state of movement, in and out of the pose. Together we negotiate the pose, how long the session will be, what music will inspire, nudity versus clothed. When my model is inspired, so am |. | cannot do the drawing without his or her vital input. Tyranny of the Pose In a classroom or private drawing group setting, the intimate relationship between model and artist is problematic. Who am | really posing for? Although the human form is common to us all, it is questionable as to why | should take my clothes off for a bunch of virtual strangers. 9 = What a bizarre scenario. Here's what | would like to do: choose one person in the group with whom | feel some affinity, and have the same kind of one-on-one relationship with that artist as | have described above. Together we could choose a pose that suits us both and when he or she would not be looking at me, | could then move. This arrangement would benefit all concerned. For the model, there Kill Your Boss, 31.5 x 47.25", 1999 would be a more intimate contact and stronger reason for being there in the first place; he or she would also be able to re-energize the pose by moving in and out of it throughout the session. For the one artist with whom the model is in direct contact, he or she would experience perhaps a more vital feeling to the whole creative process. Many times | have heard how artists, whether they are students or not, forget that the model is nude, is a human being; ultimately we end up becoming nothing more than a still life - no wonder the French called it "dead nature". How exciting is that? : Furthermore, many teachers still regard the model as subordinate: basically that we should shut up and do as we are told. What | am talking about here is domestication of the muse. Instead of being regarded as a co-creator in a process that is ultimately untame, we are treated as nothing more than a serf under the guise of "employee". If | Had It My Way Ideals always lead to action. This is why | have written this article. Having been on both sides of the fence, | feel that it is.of utmost importance that we begin to seriously question the role of model to artist. The ideas | have suggested here are only the starting point. It's time to break free of the static, rigid tyranny of the pose and create a more interactive, dynamic process of co-creation. In other words, it's time to stop riding on the back of muse and walk side-by-side instead. In a classroom or private drawing group ~ 31.5 x 47.25", 1999 _ She Said She Swam with Lightning, setting, the intimate relationship between model and artist is problematic. Who am | really posing for? | rigid tyranny of the pose and create a more interactive, dynamic process of co-creation. In other words, it’s time to riding on the back of muse and walk Intimacy 1am blessed with numerous friends, colleagues, and family who are excited to model for me. This creative relationship is based on mutuality and appreciation ~ there is a cyclical movement of inspiration between the two of us. When my eyes are on my paper, my model's eyes are on me and he or she is resting, taking a break from the pose. Each time my eyes return to look at this wonderful human being in front of me, my muse is back in the pose. It works in much the same way as when | am drawing myself, in that he or she is in a constant state of movement, in and out of the pose. Together we negotiate the pose, how long. the session will be, what music will inspire, nudity versus clothed. When my model is inspired, so am |. | cannot do the drawing without his or her vital input: Tyranny of the Pose In a classroom or private drawing group setting, the intimate relationship between model and artist is problematic. Who am I really posing for? Although the human form is common to us all, it is questionable as to why | should take my. clothes off for a bunch of virtual strangers. * ‘What a bizarre scenario. Here's what I would like to do: choose one person in the ‘group with whom | feel some affinity, and have the same kind of one-on-one telationship with that artist as | have described above. Together we could choose ‘a pose that suits us both and when he or she would not be looking at me, | could then move. This arrangement would benefit all concerned. For the model, there Kill Your Boss, 31.5 x 47.25", 1999 would be a more intimate contact and stronger reason for being there in the first place; he or she would also be able to re-energize the pose by moving in and out of it throughout the session. For the one artist with whom the model is in direct ‘contact, he or she would experience perhaps a more vital feeling to the whole creative process. Many times | have heard how artists, whether they are students or not, forget that the model is nude, is a human being; ultimately we end up becoming nothing more than a still life ~ no wonder the French called it "dead nature”. How exciting is that? Furthermore, many teachers stil regard the model as subordinate: basically that we should shut up and do as we are told. What | am talking about here is domestication of the muse. Instead of being regarded as a co-creator in a process that is ultimately untame, we are treated as nothing more than a serf under the guise of “employee”. If Had It My Way Ideals always lead to action. This is why | have written this article. Having been ‘on both sides of the fence, | feel that itis of utmost importance that we begin to seriously question the role of model to artist. The ideas | have suggested here are only the starting point. It's time to break free of the static, rigid tyranny of the pose and create a more interactive, dynamic process of co-creation. In other Words, it's time to stop riding on the back of muse and walk side-by-side instead. In a classroom or private drawing group 31.5 x 47.25", 1999 She Said She Swam with Lightning, setting, the intimate relationship between model and artist is problematic. Who am | really posing for? 21 @)