Hi. Last month, PoA had the opportunit was in town for the opening of his and gy People expect that you take the same political activist position that your work does, but you said at your lecture at ECIAD that you don’t take that position anymore, that you're a painter... Well, I’m both, you see. | have been activist in various causes, and my painting speaks to some degree about certain of these causes. At the same time it isn’t always that up front, and I’m interested as much in the psychology of the psychic lives of who are in these paintings. So, a guy’s not just a goon, you follow? you know? He's a guy who may have children, and may be capable of tenderness. At the same time, he mia S Capa Te of hitting somebody over the head with a gun or shooting them and not feel a damn thing, or even get pleasure out of it, you see. He may be all these things at once and many other things as well. Most artists are a little evasive, okay. And the reason you’re evasive often is you’re not sure of the answers, and you may not want to reveal your unsureness. Or maybe, you're afraid if you reveal too much, everybody will get it, and then what's the point of even look- ing at it anymore, you see? You know, everybody gets it, you know, you follow, you see... Art has to be in flux, no matter what the art is. Take someone like Wyeth. He’s often condemned for being one- dimensional. That his realism is just what it is, almost like Norman Rockwell, but not quite. Norman Rockwell and Wyeth aren’t going to let you get away with that if they can help it. They’re gonna say that you’re coming to it with a bias and an over-simplistic [approach]. So | can’t provide for all the students at Emily Carr... what is this that I’m supposed to be, or who | am, or so on and so forth. You make something, you stick it up. The minute it goes up nineeas has_a right to an opinion. You've gone public. Don complain if eople say t —_ ou don't like. You tuck it up tneré, t — gonna say things, okay? At the same time, while you can’t Control what they’re going to say, you don’t necessarily have to care much what individuals among them will say, either. Because, often they‘re preju- ' diced, or screwed, up or something else. In two paintings that I’ve done, | have twelve inch letters that say “TRANSMISSION GARBLED”. All these messages are garbled because they’re coming from all directions, and they interrupt each other. And art has to do that, too. How do you position yourself politically within the context of your work today? S Well, you might say I’m a liberal or left-liberal in political points of view. | adhere to the notion that you let people speak up, and do what they’re doing as long as they're not really injuring others... and you leave people alone as much as possible, but the society has an obliga- tion to help those who for one reason or another are not capable of resolving certain kinds of things like poverty, and so on. Like for example, | believe — and it’s not such a radical thought either — that people like you shouldn’t owe money at the end of your education, that the government should provide education free or virtually free. College students should be able to go to college for four years with- out having to owe $30,000 at the end of it, that’s ridiculous. Because that’s one of the greatest assets a country can have, is an educated [populace]. In many European countries, it’s easier. Maybe it’s easier in Canada, too, I’m just thinking about the United States. So it’s soci- May-June 1996 / Planet of the Arts 13 ety that penalizes it’s young people, it makes life tough for them. Do you see yourself being more of a critic or an observer? It depends on the day of the week, or the hour. My work has a criti- cal edge to it in a political sense. But I’m also an observer. I’m trying to tell it the way it is. It’s like documentary photography: to what extent is the person an observer or a critic? Lines cross — maybe times I've been more one than the other. Could you tell me about being a social critic using fine art as a medium? 3 - No...no... Art is where Society is, It’s not sup- posed to be some beautiful flower isolated somewhere in a PFecious glass case. | don’t think it’s that way, and in most societies is hasn’t been that way. So | think that art has to be part and parcel of whatever it is that’s going on. | think the artist has to be in the centre of society. But what’s the cen- tre of society? Periphery is part of society, too... you could say that periphery is centre of society, about things that happen at the edge, you see. Mass media is at the centre of society right now: television, etc. How does using fine art relate to the audience that you could reach compared to that through the mass media? Of course, and who are you appealing to? A number of museums and rich people to take your work. Everything moves through things. For example, in today’s Vancouver Sun there’s an article on my wife and myself. So, even if people don’t go see the show [at the VAG], and most of them won’t read the article, they could n’t care less, they glimpse it and they see some- thing, and somehow it enters at some level, and so’ on. j Or if you think of the scandals of Mapplethorp and Serrano, that’s something that became a big public issue...of course, they’re both photographers, media stuff, and so on. If painting is dead today, there’s not much I can do about, and that’s all | can do anyway. I've tried like hell to push my work into the. public or civic sphere. I’ve tried to shove it into it as much as | can. How has Nancy’s work influenced yours over the years, and vice-versa? We have a very good relationship in terms of critical attitudes. We criticize each other all the time, and we’re very straight forward. And we have never hurt the other one’s feelings, no matter what we say, because we have total confidence that what's coming is coming straight. There are some influences. For example, we both were interested in Greek and Etruscan art about the same time, and it entered our work, but differently. Or currently, we’re both interested in using quite a bit of colour. And we both picked up on using photographic stuff. So the influences go back and forth. Why did you continue to pursue the avenue of art galleries when you were being ignored from it, and why did you stay in the art world? The other alternative would be to try to do public murals, or get out of art altogether. I’ve thought about ge art. periods when _| was despondent. Things were kind of .. totall disgusting, and it was Nard to make a living... at the time we had small chil- dren and | worried a lot. But the thing | felt most interested in and most qualified to do was to paint. | taught most of these years when | could get jobs. What was the point in giving up? The alternatives | had weren’t so great anyway. Artists have a strong drive in them to keep going. If you’re unhappy with your role as an artist,it’s okay to quit the art world, but if you quit, don’t look back. Don’t to there’s a damn good chance you'll D€ unhappy if you step out of e he ar t oO. | used to tell my students, don’t tting Out Of ere were years that you shoul quit, then vali to | e Leo Hi, Last month, PoA had the opportunit) was in town for the opening of his and. wite Mim ita the VAG. The conversation went sor on Golub. He Spero's exhib: People expect that you take the same political activist postion that your work does, but you said at your lecture at ECIAD that you don't take that position anymore, that you're ‘a painter. ‘Well, Fm both, you se. I have been activist in various causes, and my painting speaks to some degree about certain of these causes. At the Same time it isnt always that upfront, and t'm interested as much in the psychology ofthe psychic lives of who are in these paintings. So, 2 gs nat jst a goon, you follow? you know? He’s a guy who may have children, and may be capable of beer ian ae Be same time, he ma cal iting somebody over the head witha Ble 2 shooting them and not feel a damn thing, or even get pleasure out oft, you see. He may be all these things at once and many other things as well Most artists area itl evasive, okay. And the reason you're evasive often is you're not sure ofthe answers, and you may not want to reveal your unsureness. Or maybe, you'e afraid if you reveal too much, everybody wil get it, and then what's the point of even look- ing at it anymore, you see? You know, everybody gets it, you know, you follow, you see... Art has to be in flux, no matter what the artis “Take someone like Wyeth. He's often condemned for being one- «dimensional. That his realism is ust what its, almost ike Norman Rockwell, ut not quite. Norman Rockwell and Wyeth aren‘t going to le you get avay wth that if tey can help it Theyre gonna say that you're coming to it with a bias and an over-simplstc approach]. So! ‘can't provide for all the students at Emily Carr... what is this that I'm supposed to be, or who | am, or so on and so forth. You make something, you stick it up, The minute it goes up sales cy ioe a i i to an opinion, feo ay Eon fain i a ‘ou op i the cyte don't say things, Meg fa the same-tnte, while you can’ towel west they/te going to say, you don't necessarily have to care much what individuals among them wil say, either. Because often theyre preju- diced, or screwed, up or something else in two paintings that ve done, Ihave twelve inch letters that say “TRANSMISSION GARBLED". All these messages are garbled because they/e coming from all directions, and they interrupt each other. And art has to do that, too. How de yu poston yourself pot within the conten of your work today’ Wel, you might say t'm a liberal or left-iberal in political points of view. | adhere to the notion that you let people speak up, and do what they're doing as long as they're not relly injuring others... and you leave people alone as much as possible, but the socety has an obliga- tion to help those who for one reason or another are not capable of resolving certain kinds of things like poverty, and 50 on. Like for example, | believe ~ and it's not such a radical thought ether - that peopl like you shouldn't owe money atthe end of your education, that the government should provide education free or virtual free. ‘College students shouldbe able to goto college forfour yeas with- cout having to owe $30,000 at the end oft, thats ridiculous. Because that’s one of the greatest assets a country can have, i an educated [populace] In many European countries, its easier. Maybe is easier in Canada, oo, Ym jut thinking about the United Stats. Soi’ soc May-June 1996 / Planet of the Arts 13 ‘ety that penalizes it’s young people, it makes life tough for them. about getting out of art. ere ee Be ds when | was esp 2A things totall gusting: an I was ard make a living... at tee time we had small chil- dren and | worried alot. But the thing felt most interested in and most qualified to do was to paint. | taught most of these years when I could get jobs. What was the point in giving up? The alternatives | had werent so great anyway. ists havea strong drive in them to keep going. If you're ‘unhappy with your role as an artists olay to quit the art world, but if you quit, dont look back. Don't to there's a damp good chang you'll Be unr i you ste Do you see yourself being more of a critic or an observer? It depends on the day of the week, or the hour. My work has a criti- ‘al edge to it in a political sense. But I'm also an observer. I'm trying to tell it the way itis. It’s ke documentary photography: to what ‘extent is the person an observer ora critic? Lines cross ~ maybe times Fve been more one than the other. Could you tell me about being a social critic using fine art as medium? No.0. Art gi socjety is, It’s not su posed fo be'Some b eat arene Somewhere in a precious glass case. | don't think is that way, and in mast societies is hasn't been that way. So I think that art has. to be part and parcel of whatever itis that’s going on. | think the artist has to be in the centre of society. But what's the cen- tre of society? Periphery is part of society, too... you could say that periphery is centre of society, about things that happen at the edge, you see. Mass media is at the centre of society right now: television, etc. How does using fine art relat to the audience that you could reach compared to that through the mass media? OF course, and who are you appealing to? A number of museums and rch people to take your work: Everything moves through things. For example, in today’s Vancouver Sun there's an article on my wife fe to tal ry and myself So, even f people don't go see the show [atthe VAGI, students, , ‘and most of them won't read the article, they could- | torture yourseit that n't care less, they glimpse it and they see some- youre thing, and somehow it enters at some level, and so a ane en tor- on. TE YOUT self for twenty Or if you think of the scandals of Mapplethorp and Serrano, that’s something that became a big public issue...of course, they're both photographers, media stut, and so on. if painting is dead today, there's not much I can do about, and that’ all | can do anyway ve tried like hel to push my work into the public or civic sphere. Ive tried to shove i into it as much as can. that you shouldnt have Fa hen you're TSerable. 7 How has Nancy's work influenced yours over the years, and vice-versa? We have a very good relationship in terms ofcrtical attitudes. We cttcize each other all the time, and we'e very straight forward. And ‘we have never hurt the other one's felings, no matter what we sy, because we have total confidence that what's coming is coming straight. There are some influences. For example, we both were interested in Greek and Etruscan art about the same time, and it entered our work, but differently. Or currently, we're both interested in using quite abit ‘of colour. And we both picked up on using photographic stuff So the influences go back and forth. \Why did you continue to pursue the avenue of art galleries wien you were being ignored from it, and why did you stay in the art world? The other alternative would be to try to do public murals, or get out of art altogether. I've thought