> Will ideally increase the length of tenant stay > Should discourage multiple occupancy (the spaces are intended for single occupancy only) > Should discourage conventional cooking (space is not zoned for stoves or hot plates) > Materials and manufacturing should remain as sustainable as possible, thus excluding MDF composite wood RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGY / Target user research The research and discovery conducted by our team was completed in several different phases. We were provided with a set of interests and constraints from the vantage point of the client, but we lacked insight about the situation, needs and desires of the target users (tenants). To gather this data we employed the following research steps and methods: > Conducted a site visit to observe living situations > Photo documented the space and its surroundings > Established user profile and target audience information > Conducted a tenant survey to gather opinions > Utilized a co-creation kit (a creative kit that enables the user to answer simple but insightful questions in a tacit and visual way) > Constructed a scale replica of the ninety square foot problem-space to examine the relevant issues in context > Conducted “day-in-the-life” walk-through studies to glean information about how the space is moved through and used ona daily basis > Established a needs vs. wants framework analysis > Constructed scale mock-ups of the objects that must exist within the space (bed, fridge, etc.) in order to account for their presence in the space Important observations made during the discovery process began with the realization that when conventionally sized furniture is brought into the space, it often creates additional problems rather than viable solutions. The rooms began to look disorganized and cluttered, despite our best efforts. Many furniture items introduced into the spaces were discarded or left behind for the landlord or site management to dispose of at the end of the tenancy. We also noted that vertical space was never really used in any creative or meaningful way, with most space existing above eye level remaining unused and ignored. We considered this neglected space to be valuable real estate in terms of space planning. Inspirational and existing product research We considered a plethora of influences during the ideation phase of our development to inspire our design. Some of these sources included existing small-space living solutions such as yacht/boat cabins, recreational vehicles, train cabins, submarine facilities, and bus interiors. These examples of space management proved helpful, but did not lend well to a sense of permanence in the space. Influence was also drawn by looking at urban centres in other countries such as New York and Hong Kong for existing examples of compact living. Most examples found possessed a considerably larger budget than what was currently allotted, and therefore proved non- viable on a limited budget. Other examples of small-space furniture included hybridized furniture, which strives to combine articles such as a couch and bed. CLIENT budget space & viability implementation return on investment COMMON shelter GROUND basic needs modularity IMAGE 1 / Stakeholders and their unique set of needs and limitations are identified through discovery research. construction safety/security entertainment ease of install maintenance comfort SECONDARY USER USER